Robinhood Chain Launchpad: 30 Options Compared

No Robinhood-operated token launchpad was identified on Robinhood's official ecosystem page at the July 17, 2026 check. The official documentation describes an open network where anyone can deploy applications and explicitly says featured third-party protocols are not endorsements, affiliations, sponsorships or warranties. Treat every launchpad in this comparison, including Nock, as an independent third-party product unless Robinhood identifies it otherwise in a current official source.

No. Robinhood's official IPO Access page describes a brokerage product for requesting company shares at the IPO price as they become available to the public. It does not describe token deployment, bonding-curve sales or DEX liquidity on chain ID 4663. The launchpads compared here are independent third-party blockchain applications; they do not provide Robinhood IPO share allocations, and appearing in this comparison does not imply Robinhood endorsement.

Start with the launch model, then separate the upfront fee from curve, routing, migration and DEX pool fees. Verify whether “graduation” moves liquidity or only changes an interface badge. Finally, inspect the actual LP owner, locker or burn receipt. A platform can have a polished form while its contracts are undeployed, its public launch history is empty or its documentation conflicts.

Quick fit guide—not a safety ranking: use Nock when you want Nock's direct Uniswap v4 flow and receipt-by-receipt LP-position transfer; compare Clanker for a configurable social or web v4 launch and Bankr for a terminal, CLI, social-command or user-API workflow backed by Doppler; compare LaunchHood, MetaLaunch, launch.win, Leavehood, Recurve, HoodRich's instant mode or Openfair's instant mode for documented direct-v3 paths; compare Flap, RobinFun, RobinLaunchpad, hood.fun, The Furnace, Primehod, HoodRich or Merry Men for bonding curves; and use ChainGPT Pad only when you want an application-based token sale. Verify that each venue is operating and reconcile total fees, proxy authority, contract identity and LP custody before signing.

For a direct Uniswap v4 launch with a separately verifiable LP-position transfer, review Nock's publisher-owned route. Nock states a 0.002 ETH launch fee plus gas and exposes deployment, pool, registration and LP-transfer receipts as separate states. This is a product-fit description, not an independent best-or-safest rating.

For one interface that publishes both a bonding curve and an instant Uniswap v3 route, compare Openfair's two documented modes. For a direct v3 route with a published token-side burn-or-keep choice, compare Recurve. For an instant v3 or bonding-curve choice under one current create page, compare HoodRich mode by mode rather than generalizing one fee or lock claim across every path.

For a bonding curve, compare Flap's Robinhood-specific Portal documentation alongside Merry Men's creator-selected WETH or USDG target. For an agent or terminal workflow, compare Bankr's user-key Robinhood route and note that partner-key launches remain Base-only. For application-based token sales, KYC/refund workflows or private rounds, compare ChainGPT Pad rather than a permissionless memecoin factory. In every case, recheck operating status, the complete fee path, proxy authority, deployed contract identity and actual LP custody before signing.

This refresh added Flap, Clanker and Bankr, bringing the comparison to 30 current search-visible options. Flap's first-party Robinhood integration guide publishes its Portal route; Clanker's own token pages show Robinhood Chain v4 deployments; and Bankr documents terminal, CLI, social-command and user-API launches on chain 4663. The Bankr partner-key route remains Base-only.

The page now separates platform discovery from quantitative evidence: 30 products have a dated first-party source, while 12 have enough public fee, graduation and LP fields for quantitative matrix coverage. Uniswap CCA is not counted because the current official uniswap-cca deployer allowlist omits chain 4663. Inclusion, deployed bytecode and a polished interface are not converted into an endorsement, audit result, popularity rank or safety conclusion.

Nock's publisher-owned flow creates a fixed 1B-supply ERC-20, initializes a direct Uniswap v4 pool and separately transfers the LP-position NFT to the dead address after the burn transaction confirms. The stated launch fee is 0.002 ETH plus gas. An optional developer buy uses the standard 1% Nock swap fee. Registration alone is not treated as proof that the LP transfer succeeded.

RobinFun describes a 1B-supply fair-launch curve with 70% of supply on the curve, a 1% curve-trade fee and graduation around a displayed $44k market-cap threshold. Its materials state that graduation moves liquidity to Uniswap v2 and burns the LP. The upfront creation fee was not established in the checked source, and vendor claims should be reconciled with the actual token receipt.

RobinLaunchpad documents a fixed 1B-supply constant-product bonding curve with virtual reserves, no seeded liquidity and a 6.9% fee on the ETH side of buys and sells. A 1% creator share is included in that fee. Graduation occurs after 800M tokens are bought, when remaining tokens and raised ETH become liquidity described as permanently locked inside the contract.

hood.fun publishes a gas-only creation model, a creator-selected 1–5% curve fee with an 80/20 split, and a migration charge of 3% of the raise plus 0.05 ETH. Its whitepaper places graduation near 6.5 ETH raised and describes migration to Uniswap v3 with a permanently locked LP position. Those mechanics are vendor-published, not an independent audit.

RobinPad's fee page says no platform launch fee, a 1% Uniswap pool fee split 60/30/10 and a $69k interface milestone without migration. Other documentation mentions a 0.0011 ETH fee and migration. At the last direct check, its three published platform addresses had no deployed bytecode, and its stated v3 factory matched Uniswap's published v2 factory. It was not verified as live.

LaunchHood documents a fixed 1B supply, no platform creation fee, a direct Uniswap v3 pool and a 1% pool fee split equally between creator and protocol. Its 4 ETH “graduation” is a site milestone rather than a liquidity migration. The LP position remains in a locker, so users should verify locker ownership, implementation and withdrawal constraints rather than treating “locked” as synonymous with burned.

MetaLaunch's current V5 page states a 0.0005 ETH creation fee, a direct 1% Uniswap v3 pool and a current 70/20/10 fee split. It does not describe a separate graduation event. Current mechanics should not be mixed with legacy versions, and its ownerless-locker description should be checked against the current deployment and position owner before launch.

The Furnace describes a gas-only bonding-curve launch, a 0.50% protocol fee, graduation near a $44k threshold and a locked Uniswap v3 LP position. At the last check its contracts appeared deployed but its public interface showed zero launches. That is an operating-status observation, not a judgment about code quality or whether launches occurred outside the displayed interface.

PadQuiver presents an intended 1B-supply reward-token flow with locked liquidity and a recommended/default 1% fee tier. Its public page said the factory was not deployed and showed no tokens at the last check. It is therefore labeled not live rather than compared as an operating venue; unknown launch, migration and contract fields remain not verified.

At the July 16 source recheck, DYOR Fun's previously reviewed documentation domain no longer resolved. The historical evidence set recorded a 0.0005 ETH creation fee, direct 1% Uniswap v3 pool, a 4.5 ETH interface-only graduation milestone and an LP NFT held in a described no-withdrawal vault, but those vendor terms are no longer presented as current documentation. The factory proxy remains independently inspectable on Robinhood Chain Blockscout; current product terms are marked unavailable rather than inferred.

GoBolt describes an approximately $2.50 direct launch into Uniswap v4, a 1% routing fee plus a dynamic pool fee, and an approximately 0.4% creator share at launch. Its published factory and hook both had bytecode at the last check; the factory was unverified and the verified hook was named UniversalKlikHook. That does not prove exclusive ownership, audit status or universal compatibility.

HoodTracker's launch form states a 0.0005 ETH creation fee, fixed 1B supply, direct 1% Uniswap v3 pool, 60% native-side creator share, a temporary 2% max-wallet rule and a no-withdrawal LP vault. Its documentation still said the launchpad was in final private testing. The public-form versus docs conflict remains visible; successful public launch history was not established.

ChainGPT Pad's Robinhood Chain page covers curated token sales, tiered IDOs, open public sales, KYC/refund workflows, campaigns and private rounds on chain 4663. It is an application-based token-sale platform, not a permissionless memecoin factory. Robinhood-specific issuer fees, participant fees, migration rules, LP treatment and contract addresses were not verified on the checked public page.

Robinlaunch offers either a bonding curve or direct Uniswap v3 pool. Its page states 0.5% creator rewards on curve trades, a 2.5 ETH graduation threshold and direct-pool liquidity described as permanently locked at the burn address. It is distinct from RobinLaunchpad.com. Upfront creation cost, complete platform-fee flow, contract identity and independently observed launch history remain not verified.

launch.win documents a 0.001 ETH creation fee, direct DEX pool, fixed 2% launch-window wallet cap, atomic creator buy, unique-name controls, a position NFT held by its factory and a standard 1% pool fee without another platform trade fee. Its safety and anti-bot marketing is not repeated as proof. The product explicitly says its contracts are new and unaudited.

Loxley's public site presents a Robinhood Chain launchpad and trading terminal with Stock Lab, Meme Lab Terminal and Hoodbridge surfaces. It publishes network facts but did not expose a complete launch fee, supply, pool version, LP treatment or graduation schedule in the fetched page. It remains a current category owner with unsupported mechanics explicitly marked not verified.

RevShare's current first-party article presents direct-liquidity and bonding-curve Robinhood Chain launch options plus token-creation and lock workflows. The checked page did not establish a complete Robinhood-specific upfront fee, curve or pool fee, graduation trigger, LP custody mechanism or contract registry. It is included for category visibility without converting keyword-focused marketing into product evidence.

Openfair publishes two modes: a bonding curve that collects 5 ETH before a Uniswap v3 listing, and an instant token-only-liquidity v3 launch. It states a 0.0005 ETH creation fee, configurable 0–10% buy/sell fees and a fixed 3 ETH opening market cap. Its immutability, verification and permanent-lock language remains vendor-described pending contract-level checks.

RoughLaunch presents a hybrid Robinhood Chain launchpad with single-sided Uniswap v3 liquidity from block one, milestone graduation, creator LP-fee sharing and open-source verified LaunchToken contracts. Its current page states no platform launch fee beyond gas and shows one launched token. A complete pool-fee split, graduation threshold, factory registry and LP ownership proof were not established in the checked public surface.

Novapex's current documentation describes a 1B-supply constant-product curve, with 800M tokens sold on the curve and 200M reserved for a Uniswap v2 pool. It states a zero platform creation fee plus gas, a flat 1% fee on buys and sells, and permissionless graduation after exactly 3 ETH is raised. The site simultaneously labels its contracts unaudited and intended for testnet and education while publishing both mainnet and testnet network details. Its public API host timed out at the July 16 check, and the fetched documentation did not expose a current factory address, so Nock does not treat Novapex as verified mainnet-live. The v2 LP-burn and pricing-continuity statements remain vendor-described.

Pons's current create page presents a noncustodial fixed-supply Robinhood Chain launch flow with a displayed 0.0005 ETH launch fee, 4.2 ETH graduation figure, Uniswap/ETH venue, locked liquidity, optional developer buy and a creator wallet that receives a share of trading fees. Its legal terms identify Pons Labs, LLC as the interface operator and state that token creation is not review, sponsorship or endorsement. The checked first-party pages did not expose complete curve math, the trading-fee rate, factory or locker addresses, the exact graduation transaction, or the lock implementation. Its analytics page said Dune history was unavailable and displayed zero, so external popularity or launch-count claims are not substituted for verified operating totals.

The Greenwood's current launch form publishes a fixed 100B supply, gas-only creation, a direct 1% Robinhood Chain pool, an optional initial buy and an optional 1–30% supply vault with a minimum seven-day lock. The form embeds factory 0x81de990be508b95540b3c519417e7c0755b42977; a July 17 RPC check found 17,297 bytes of deployed code and nine logs matching the client-published launch topic through July 14. Its homepage simultaneously uses live labels and says its own token is launching soon, so operating status remains evidence-conflicted. The permanent-LP-lock and 80% creator-reward mechanics remain vendor or client-code claims because the checked explorer surface did not establish verified factory source or the lock implementation.

Primehod offers either a site-only bonding curve or a direct Uniswap v3 launch. Its public controls show 1%, 2% or 3% curve base rates and $5k, $10k or $20k graduation milestones, while nearby copy says creators can choose 1–5%; its v3 mode states a fixed 1% fee. Both modes describe a 55/45 creator/platform fee split, and the create page says curve trading stays open after the milestone rather than migrating.

Primehod publishes its factory source and address, 0x57EfC7cE5250C96B0b0E7C554c9d9743A18b794f. A July 17 RPC check found deployed code and five logs matching the source-published TokenLaunched event at the current factory, while the public board displayed six tokens. Nock reports those as separate observations rather than treating the board total as a factory count. The repository describes an internal security review, not an independent third-party audit, and the curve/v3 lock language remains vendor-described.

Leavehood uses a Uniswap v3 pool as the bonding curve, with no separate liquidity migration. Its documentation says the v3 LP charges 1%, burns the token-side fees and splits the ETH-side fees equally between the creator and treasury. It references a 4.2 ETH graduation value for offchain or indexer display, not a contract migration. The numeric creation fee is read from getCreateFee() and was not stated in the checked page.

A July 17 RPC check resolved deployed EIP-1967 implementations behind Leavehood's published factory and core proxies and found deployed code at its separate lock address. The project's own commissioned, AI-assisted review describes the core and factory as owner-controlled UUPS proxies and the lock contract as a non-upgradeable 100-year time lock. That document is a point-in-time self-published review, not an Anthropic-certified, professional third-party or formal audit. Raw proxy and core logs are not reported as launch counts because they were not decoded into a qualifying launch event set.

The former pad.hoodscan.ai URL now redirects to Recurve, so this comparison treats Recurve as the current product rather than counting HoodPad twice. Recurve's current documentation describes a fixed 1B supply placed into a single-sided Uniswap v3 range in one launch transaction, with no separate bonding-curve contract or liquidity migration. The published launch fee is 0.0005 ETH plus gas; the pool fee is 1%, with the ETH-side fee described as a 90/10 creator/protocol split and the token-side fee either burned or retained according to the launcher's frozen mode.

Recurve calls 4.2 ETH a graduation status for the interface, not an onchain migration. Its documentation publishes contract 0xd41a03a01369a734a5e22c3d6484b4040ae9acfd and describes it as non-upgradeable. A July 17 RPC check at block 11,992,762 found 18,303 bytes of runtime code at that address. The same docs state that an owner can pause new launches, adjust the split for future coins within a stated floor and reassign a creator-fee recipient for a community takeover; those controls must not be collapsed into a generic ownerless or immutable claim.

HoodRich's current creation surface at robinpump.space offers instant Uniswap v3, bonding-curve and a vendor-labeled “Ponzi Launch” mode. The label is the product's own mode name, not Nock's endorsement or description of legal status. Its live first-party /api/config response separately exposes curve, instant, flywheel and branded-mode factory fields, each with a displayed 0.0005 ETH creation fee. The instant path places a fixed 1B supply into a direct v3 pool, has no curve graduation and describes a 1% pool fee whose creator share is 40%.

The same live config exposes curve tiers of 1.5, 3.5 and 6 ETH, with 3.5 ETH selected by default, plus separate instant, curve, flywheel and branded-mode factory addresses and two lock addresses. A July 17 RPC check at block 11,992,762 found deployed runtime code at every one of those named factories and locks, while the current token API returned records attributed to both the instant and branded-mode factories. This establishes current configuration, deployed bytecode and first-party API activity; it does not independently prove the site's permanent-lock language, fee accounting, audit status or the behavior of every mode.

Merry Men presents a Robinhood Chain launch guild with configurable WETH- or USDG-quoted bonding curves. Its current first-party interface says creation requires gas rather than a separate deposit, charges 1.25% on curve trades and 0.05% at migration, then opens a 1% Uniswap pool. The product describes an 80/20 creator/protocol fee split and lets the creator set a graduation target that becomes fixed when the launch is submitted.

The current first-party client publishes factory 0xfa4B952c15BC9d418ae4f552F7Fc76b4470596fE, LP locker 0xd404C0fF8dE11841a4ff9CC4382eA5F6e4010751, swap router 0x19204230c4077F437a757934d73175F72FE9F476 and fee viewer 0xada9aE7e8710A4490B299151915b2056D9e0571b. A July 17 RPC check at block 11,992,762 found deployed code at all four. The site's statement that the graduated LP-position NFT is held by the locker remains vendor-described; deployed code alone does not prove a no-withdrawal path, audit quality or any launch count.

Flap publishes a Robinhood Chain integration guide for its Portal token-launch protocol and a Robinhood-specific deployed Portal address. Its general first-party mechanics describe a fixed 1B-supply constant-product bonding curve that moves the remaining supply and reserve into a DEX pool after the circulating-supply threshold is reached. The Robinhood protocol-fee page states a 1% bonding-curve rate.

The checked Robinhood guide and protocol pages did not establish a separate upfront creation charge, the exact Robinhood graduation reserve, the resulting DEX version or final LP-position custody. Those fields remain not verified rather than being inherited from another Flap chain. A published contract address and integration guide establish a current workflow, not an independent audit or popularity ranking.

Clanker's first-party site shows tokens deployed on Robinhood Chain through its v4 launch path, including launches initiated from Farcaster and X. A checked token page displays a direct configurable liquidity-position launch, no curve graduation, a 1% buy fee, 1% sell fee and 0.2% Clanker fee for that token, plus a short-lived configurable sniper fee. Those values are token-specific rather than a universal Clanker fee promise.

The checked public surface did not establish a separate Robinhood creation charge, a platform-wide default fee configuration, complete factory registry or final LP-position owner for every launch. Nock therefore records current first-party deployment evidence and the observed example configuration without generalizing one token's settings across the platform.

Bankr documents Robinhood Chain token launching through its terminal, CLI, X command and user API. The CLI accepts --chain robinhood, and the user deploy endpoint accepts chain: robinhood for chain ID 4663, returns a Uniswap v4 pool ID and uses Doppler. Bankr states that gas is sponsored within the user's rate-limit tier and that a standard launch reserves 15% for a two-year creator vest with a 30-day cliff while 85% seeds liquidity.

Bankr's FAQ states a 0.7% swap fee for Doppler-launched tokens, with 95% of that fee paid to the creator. The checked first-party pages did not establish a separate upfront token-creation fee or final LP-position custody. Partner or organization-key deploys remain Base-only, so Robinhood launches require the user-key, terminal, CLI or social-command flow and must not be represented as available through every Bankr integration.

NOXA is not counted among the 30 current options. At the July 16 check, noxa.fi served a domain-ownership page rather than the former launchpad, and the previously observed fun.noxa.fi/rh interface returned HTTP 404. CoinDesk separately reported that the platform halted token launches on July 11 and then went dark. These observations establish current public availability, not who controls historical contracts, revenue or token communities.

Creators looking for a NOXA alternative should compare the operating products above by current contract identity, launch model, complete fee path and LP treatment. A replacement should not be chosen only because it uses the same bonding-curve language or appears for the same keyword.

Vlad.fun is not counted among the 30 current options. On July 15, its official X account said the platform was pausing after reporting an internal integrity issue involving members of its team. At the July 16 recheck, vlad.fun returned HTTP 200 but loaded a whitelist landing page rather than an operating launch or trade interface. Cointelegraph and crypto.news also reported the suspension. No public restoration timeline or complete account of the issue was identified in the checked sources.

This is a dated public-availability note, not a conclusion about whether historical token contracts, pools, wallets or user funds were affected. Those questions require contract-specific and transaction-specific evidence rather than inference from the current website state.

RobinLaunchpad.com and Robinlaunch.fun are separate products with different curves, fees and graduation rules. RobinPad.fi is separate from RobinPad.xyz; no claim transfers between them. hood.fun is also distinct from HoodFun or hoodchain.fun. The former HoodPad URL redirects to Recurve and is therefore one current product entry, while HoodRich operates at robinpump.space. Always verify the exact domain and contract shown in the wallet before signing.

Uniswap Labs describes Continuous Clearing Auctions as a permissionless token-distribution and liquidity-bootstrapping framework, and its July 14 trading-tools article broadly names Robinhood Chain among supported Uniswap environments. However, the current official uniswap-cca repository's deployer skill restricts deployments to a chain allowlist that does not include Robinhood Chain ID 4663.

Because the product-level message and deployer-level implementation boundary do not yet align, this comparison does not count Uniswap CCA as an operating Robinhood Chain launch option. A future Robinhood-specific CCA factory deployment, interface route or official allowlist update would justify a new review; Uniswap swaps and liquidity support on Robinhood Chain do not by themselves prove CCA deployment support.

NOXA Fun is excluded from the current set because noxa.fi served a domain-ownership page and fun.noxa.fi/rh returned HTTP 404 at the July 16 check. This does not establish who controls historical contracts or project communities. Froth described future curve economics but also said its launchpad was coming soon and showed no launches.

Froth was announced; not live at the last check. Its proposed 1,000 FROTH launch fee, 1% curve fee, 8 ETH graduation and LP-burn mechanics remain future vendor descriptions rather than operating evidence.

Zardoz publishes an instant single-sided Uniswap v3 launch with a locker and creator-fee contracts, but a complete upfront/platform fee schedule was not established. Uniswap CCA remains excluded while the official deployer allowlist omits chain 4663. Other observed venues remain outside the detailed set until current first-party evidence is complete.