Nock Robinhood Chain Launch Registry
This dated registry maps every historical token recorded with `source=nock_launchpad` to its Robinhood Chain deployment, Uniswap v4 pool initialization, initial liquidity-position NFT and, when verified, the transaction that transferred that exact NFT to the dead address. At the July 16, 2026 snapshot, all eight launches had independently matched deployment, pool and liquidity evidence. Seven of the eight initial position NFTs were currently owned by `0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD`.
Nock Terminal publishes and operates the launch flow covered by this dataset. That conflict is explicit. The registry is launch provenance, not an independent audit, safety rating, endorsement, liquidity guarantee, activity score or proof that a token has value. Every transaction can be rechecked on Robinhood Chain Blockscout, and the machine-readable feed keeps missing evidence null rather than filling gaps with platform claims.
Direct answer: what the registry proves
For each included token, the registry proves that a specific contract-creation transaction deployed the token, a successful transaction initialized a Uniswap v4 pool containing that token, and a successful PositionManager transaction minted the recorded initial liquidity NFT. When the LP field says dead address, a later successful `transferFrom` moved that same minted NFT from the launch wallet to the exact dead address and the current `ownerOf` response still resolves there.
The registry does not prove that all trading liquidity is inaccessible, because later positions can exist. It does not inspect token-holder concentration, taxes, transfer restrictions, external contracts, social ownership, organic demand or future upgrades elsewhere in the trading stack. A successful launch sequence is evidence that the sequence happened, not a recommendation to trade the token.
How deployments are matched
The backfill starts from the public Nock launch rows and retrieves each contract-creation record from Robinhood Chain Blockscout. The contract address, creator, creation block, timestamp and transaction hash must agree. The deployment block is kept separate from the later database registration block so the public record does not mislabel pool initialization as token deployment.
A token name or symbol is never used as the primary identifier because both can be duplicated. The complete lowercase contract address is the join key. This avoids attributing a transaction to the wrong asset when several launches use similar names, repeated symbols or the same creator wallet.
How pool and liquidity evidence are matched
Pool initialization is accepted only when the successful transaction targets Robinhood Chain's known Uniswap v4 PoolManager at `0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951`, uses the initialize call and encodes the launched token address. Initial liquidity is accepted only when the successful transaction targets PositionManager at `0x58daec3116aae6d93017baaea7749052e8a04fa7`, uses `modifyLiquidities` and encodes the same token.
The resulting pool identifier is a Uniswap v4 bytes32 pool ID, not a standalone pool contract address. The initial position ID comes from the PositionManager ERC-721 mint event in the liquidity transaction receipt. Keeping pool ID and NFT ID separate prevents a common verification mistake: treating a v4 pool identifier as an address or treating a token-transfer event as proof of LP custody.
How LP-position transfers are verified
A transaction selector alone is insufficient. The audit decodes `transferFrom`, requires PositionManager as the destination, requires the launch wallet as `from`, requires the exact dead address as `to`, and requires the transferred token ID to equal the ERC-721 ID minted by that launch's liquidity transaction. It then calls `ownerOf` at the latest block and accepts the burn only if the current owner remains the dead address.
This stricter method found two stale database flags. CashFrog position 60399 and Nock Curve Test position 68105 were both transferred to the dead address and remain owned there even though their older rows said `lp_burned=false`. The backfill corrects those flags from chain evidence. Nock Test Flight position 45009 has no qualifying burn transaction in the checked sequence and remains labeled not burned rather than inferred.
Snapshot limitations and update policy
This table is a dated historical snapshot. New launches should enter the live JSON feed through receipt-backed capture, so counts can increase after publication. If a future launch is registered before one of its transaction receipts is stored, the affected evidence field remains null until it is independently reconstructed. Null means unavailable under this method, not failed, unsafe or absent.
The HTML owner explains methodology and preserves a citeable dated snapshot; the JSON distribution is the current machine-readable record. Researchers should record the feed retrieval time and relevant transaction hashes when using it. Nock should update the visible snapshot when the launch count materially changes, when verification rules change, or when a chain reorganization or corrected source affects a record.
How to independently reproduce one record
- Copy the complete launched token address from the table or JSON feed.
- Open its Blockscout contract page and confirm the creation transaction, creator and deployment block.
- Open the recorded pool-initialization transaction and confirm the PoolManager target and token address.
- Open the initial-liquidity transaction and find the PositionManager ERC-721 mint to the creator.
- If a burn hash exists, confirm the same NFT ID moved from the creator to the exact dead address.
- Call PositionManager `ownerOf` for that NFT ID or inspect the current token-instance owner.
- Treat every other token-safety, market and custody question as a separate investigation.
| Token | Contract | Deploy block | Pool init block | Position NFT | Initial LP owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nock Test Flight (TNOCK) | 0x4978…73f2 | 7,039,853 | 7,039,899 | 45009 | Creator / no verified burn |
| CashFrog (CASH) | 0xc3c7…2639 | 7,998,997 | 7,999,026 | 60399 | Dead address |
| Nock Curve Test (CURVE) | 0x4a22…6ffc | 8,481,382 | 8,481,451 | 68105 | Dead address |
| McKneeGregor (MKGG) | 0xa8fd…e82e | 8,483,496 | 8,483,547 | 68127 | Dead address |
| CashCow (CCOW) | 0x7f27…a7e0 | 8,849,163 | 8,849,314 | 75095 | Dead address |
| Cash Hamster (HAMC) | 0x90b6…24d2 | 8,923,990 | 8,924,032 | 76579 | Dead address |
| Nock Terminal (NOCK) | 0xd0ad…b5d1 | 9,076,143 | 9,076,204 | 80722 | Dead address |
| Nock Terminal (NOCT) | 0xba51…bd06 | 9,150,702 | 9,150,730 | 82980 | Dead address |
Frequently asked questions
How many historical Nock launches are in this snapshot? Eight launches were recorded at the July 16, 2026 snapshot. The live JSON feed can increase as new receipt-backed launches are registered. Does LP at the dead address prove a token is safe? No. It proves custody of the identified initial position NFT under the stated method. It does not audit token code, holders, later liquidity, trading activity or price risk. Why is one launch not marked burned? Nock Test Flight position 45009 had no qualifying transfer of that exact NFT to the dead address in the checked launch sequence, so the field remains false. Why did two records differ from the old database? The old flags were stale. The CashFrog and Nock Curve Test position NFTs were matched to successful dead-address transfers and current dead-address ownership. Is a Uniswap v4 pool ID a contract address? No. It is a bytes32 identifier derived from the pool key. Robinhood Chain v4 pools share PoolManager rather than deploying one contract per pool. Can GeckoTerminal or another indexer use this dataset? Yes, as a provenance input. The JSON feed supplies token, creator, pool ID, position and transaction evidence, but each provider controls its own review and category rules.
Sources and verification
Last verified: July 16, 2026
The HTML table is a dated snapshot. Use the JSON feed for the current registry and recheck every cited transaction on Robinhood Chain Blockscout.
Related
Nock Terminal is an independent product and is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc. Research and product documentation are informational and are not investment advice.
Create on chain 4663
Ready to launch a Robinhood Chain token?
Use Nock's guided launch flow, then verify the deployment, pool and LP-position receipts onchain.