Robinhood Chain Launchpad Fees and Graduation

An upfront platform fee, network gas, a bonding-curve fee, a DEX pool fee and a migration charge are different costs. A creator share can be carved out of a trading fee or paid from collected LP fees. The matrix keeps those scopes separate so a low creation fee is not mistaken for a low lifetime trading cost.

Status matters too. A polished launch form does not prove that a factory is deployed or that public launches have occurred. Products with no observed bytecode, an undeployed factory, zero launches or conflicting first-party pages are labeled rather than silently promoted as established venues.

RobinFun, hood.fun and The Furnace describe a curve that reaches a threshold and then moves liquidity into a Uniswap pool. RobinPad and LaunchHood describe graduation primarily as a badge, chart or interface milestone while the same pool remains; the historical DYOR Fun evidence set described the same pattern, but its documentation domain no longer resolved at the July 16 recheck. Nock Terminal, MetaLaunch, GoBolt and HoodTracker describe direct-liquidity launches with no separate curve migration.

Comparing graduation market capitalizations without comparing the pricing model, quote asset, virtual reserves, fee deductions and migration mechanics can be misleading. A threshold is a platform rule, not proof of organic demand or lasting liquidity.

A burned LP NFT or LP token is sent to an address from which it is not expected to be recoverable. A locked position remains owned by a locker or vault whose code and upgrade authority determine what can happen next. RobinLaunchpad describes liquidity locked inside its contract, while hood.fun and LaunchHood describe lockers. Nock describes a separate LP-position transfer that must confirm after registration.

Neither mechanism proves that the token contract is safe, that holders are distributed fairly, that price cannot collapse or that trading activity is organic. Users should verify the exact position owner, proxy authority and transaction receipt rather than relying on a badge.

RobinPad's dedicated fee page says launch has no platform fee and graduation is a UI milestone, while other documentation sections mention a 0.0011 ETH fee and migration. Its three published platform addresses returned no deployed bytecode at the last direct RPC check. PadQuiver explicitly showed an undeployed factory, and The Furnace showed deployed contracts but zero launches.

HoodTracker exposed an active-looking public launch form while its documentation still said final private testing. These conflicts are not resolved by guessing. Recheck the wallet transaction preview, current deployed bytecode and first-party documentation immediately before signing.

• What exact platform fee, gas estimate, pool fee and routing fee appear in the wallet preview?
• Does graduation migrate liquidity or only change a badge and discovery placement?
• Who owns the LP position after launch, and can the owner, proxy admin or implementation change?
• Which fee share belongs to the creator, protocol, referrer, incentives reserve or token holders?
• Does the published factory address contain bytecode on chain ID 4663?
• Can you reconstruct the token deployment, pool creation and LP-custody steps from the receipt?