Robinhood Chain Trading Bot Fees and Custody
Public fee and custody disclosures for Robinhood Chain trading bots remain incomplete. NockBot currently publishes a 1% per-swap fee. RobinSwap's web swap shows a 0.5% platform fee, but that should not be assigned to its Telegram bot without a separate source. Robinhood Sniper explicitly describes a custodial wallet with encrypted, exportable keys. Other vendors document support or general wallet architecture but do not publish every Robinhood-specific fee and custody field. Last checked July 16, 2026.
Methodology: include six products with a current first-party Robinhood Chain source or clearly separated architecture evidence. Chain-specific and general vendor disclosures remain distinct; web and Telegram surfaces remain distinct. “Not verified” means the checked public source did not establish the field. Vendor descriptions are not independent security audits or execution tests. Nock Terminal owns NockBot and discloses that publisher conflict.
Why fee scope matters
A bot platform fee, DEX liquidity-provider fee, network gas charge, bridge fee and launch fee are separate. A fee displayed by a web swap cannot automatically be assigned to a Telegram bot from the same brand. Likewise, a general pricing page may not describe the Robinhood Chain integration.
Compare the quoted input and output, route, price impact, platform fee, pool fee and network cost immediately before signing. A public percentage can still exclude gas and slippage, and a missing public fee is an evidence gap rather than proof of a free service.
Custodial does not mean the same thing as key export
Custodial execution means the service participates in key storage or signing. A key-export function may reduce lock-in, but it does not retroactively make a server-managed wallet non-custodial. Enclave, MPC, Turnkey, Privy and encrypted-key statements describe architecture and should not be treated as independent audits.
Before funding a bot wallet, test the withdrawal and key-export path with a small amount, verify the destination address, and understand whether recovery depends on the vendor account. Never supply a recovery phrase to support staff or an unrelated bot.
Product evidence notes
NockBot's public page establishes its supported Robinhood Chain contract-address flow and current 1% platform fee, while custody and key export remain not verified on that page. Axiom describes a non-custodial Turnkey-secured wallet in general material, but Robinhood-specific fee and key-export fields remain unverified.
Banana Gun documents Robinhood Chain market buys, limit orders and copy trading; locally generated keys and no-platform-custody are broader vendor architecture. Maestro names Robinhood Chain and general bot features but did not expose the checked custody, export or chain-specific fee fields.
Robinhood Sniper explicitly calls its wallet custodial and says keys are encrypted and exportable. RobinSwap must be split by surface: its Telegram disclosure describes created, encrypted and exportable wallet keys, while its web swap calls itself non-custodial and visibly shows a 0.5% platform fee.
Products awaiting stronger Robinhood Chain documentation
APM documents general EVM trading products while its durable Robinhood Chain integration page was not available. Cove's current first-party supported-chain registry omitted Robinhood Chain despite third-party promotional coverage. BasedBot's public vendor app did not expose crawlable chain documentation, and based-bot.com identifies itself as an affiliate guide.
Sherwood Sniper Bot claims experimental chain support and a custodial wallet but also displays the zero address as its token contract and makes unverified performance and fee-distribution claims. These products remain evidence-status notes rather than entries in the primary six-product matrix.
What remains unknown
The largest gaps are Robinhood-specific fee schedules, custody recovery, key export, supported pool and launchpad scope, and the difference between marketing latency and measured execution. Missing disclosure is not an accusation. It is a reason to verify the current product interface before depositing funds or signing approvals.
| Product | Surface | Custody | Key export | Public RH Chain fee | Evidence caveat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NockBot | Telegram | Not verified on checked page | Not verified | 1% per supported swap | Publisher-owned; no independent fill benchmark |
| Axiom | Web terminal | General non-custodial Turnkey statement | Not verified for Robinhood Chain | Not verified | General architecture is not chain-specific evidence |
| Banana Gun | Telegram | Broader locally generated key architecture | Broader architecture only | Not verified | Robinhood article does not restate custody details |
| Maestro | Telegram | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Support and general features are documented |
| Robinhood Sniper | Telegram | Custodial | Vendor says encrypted and exportable | Not verified | Vendor speed and security claims not independently tested |
| RobinSwap | Telegram + web | Telegram encrypted keys; web says non-custodial | Telegram says exportable | 0.5% web swap only; bot not verified | Do not transfer fees or custody labels between surfaces |
Frequently asked questions
Which Robinhood Chain trading bot publishes a public fee? NockBot publishes a current 1% per-supported-swap fee. RobinSwap shows 0.5% on its web swap, not automatically on its Telegram bot. Which Robinhood Chain trading bots are custodial? Robinhood Sniper explicitly describes a custodial wallet. Other rows use the exact checked disclosure or say not verified. Does key export make a bot non-custodial? No. Export may reduce lock-in, but a service-managed signing or storage flow can still be custodial. Is RobinSwap's 0.5% fee also its Telegram-bot fee? Not verified. The checked 0.5% disclosure belongs to the web swap and should not be transferred to the bot. Why are some fields marked not verified? The checked first-party source did not establish that Robinhood-specific field. It does not prove the feature is absent. Is this a security audit or recommendation? No. It is a dated disclosure-quality dataset based on public first-party sources.
Sources and verification
Last verified: July 16, 2026
Fee scope, custody and key export are reported only where the checked first-party source establishes them. Nock Terminal publishes this page and owns NockBot.
Related
Nock Terminal is an independent product and is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc. Research and product documentation are informational and are not investment advice.
Move from research to execution
Review the token, route and transaction before you trade
Use Nock's market context first, then review NockBot's supported Robinhood Chain trade flow and current fee disclosure.